Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Gloria Swanson vs Kenneth Anger


 Ironic.  I am not one to usurp articles, so I will just have to kindly point you in the direction of Celebrity Gossip, Academic Style's well researched article "How to deal with a Coffin full of Sugar".  It documents Gloria Swanson's attempts to sue Kenneth Anger over Hollywood Babylon (lucky for her his passages on her were quite brief) in the 70s and his bat shit crazy (to quote and sincerely agree with the article's author) harassment that followed, including sending her a coffin full of sugar.  It would almost be clever if it wasn't so macabre (Swanson would die within 10 years of the events) and persistent (he sent her SEVERAL harassing cards, which you can view in the article, over a time period indicating fallen glory, death, and sugar.)  Why sugar?  Gloria was a huge promoter of macrobiotic diets and compared sugar to poison.

While I'm certain Gloria Swanson was no angel, she definitely was fascinating and the sheer amount of balls this originator of kookies had makes me sick.  I know Clara Bow's sons also considered suing.  I wonder if anyone else did or tried.  If it happened in this day and age they would have won.  Seems silent stars never had much luck in court.

I'd like to quote the article as to why anyone should give a damn, let alone Glory Swanson, "Swanson included the Anger correspondence (in her archives) with reason. And I argue that Swanson preserved the evidence — as well as detailed copies of the lawsuit — not only to show that she arduously pursued her ‘innocence,’ but also as a means of indicting Anger. The existence of these materials — and their availability to scholars such as myself — labors to exonerate Swanson of Anger’s claims, affirming and preserving Swanson’s own carefully maintained image of glamour, integrity, and sophistication.

It matters little whether Swanson, the woman, was, in fact, glamourous and sophisticated. Far more interesting are her efforts to maintain that image — and how threatened she felt by the publication of two sentences in a book already widely discredited. To my mind, Swanson’s eagerness to take legal action highlights her awareness of the power of gossip. Having lived through the silent, classic, and post-classical age, she witnessed the ways in which magazines like Confidential and The National Enquirer had, though well-crafted innuendo, severely tarnished star images.

For gossip matters not because it’s true, or because people even necessarily believe it, but because its suggestions become permanently affixed to the star image. And gossip especially sticks when it seems to complement a pre-exisiting star image. The relative genius of Anger and Hollywood Babylon, no matter how fabricated, was that it confirmed what many secretly wanted to believe about the stars: namely, that they were snotty, backstabbing, and promiscuous. That’s why people believed Anger’s claim that Clara Bow had sex with the entire USC football team — the rumor still circulates, despite its repeated refutation. It’s also why Anger’s depiction of Swanson so angered the star: it rang dangerously true. It meshed with understandings of Swanson’s opulent and excessive lifestyle, yet highlighted what seemed to be the flipside of such sophistication: an inner ‘bitch.’"

THIS is why people like Kenneth Anger and David Bret and other fame whoring monsters anger me so.  There was a book just released last month that included the Clara Bow gangbang myth (the author graciously apologized when I pointed out the massive debunking that has taken).  Anger's insistence that Rudolph Valentino was 'married to two lesbians' and 'gave Ramon Novarro and art deco dildo' have become so persistent any book worth its weight in research has to mention and debunk such garbage.  Silent stars aren't the only ones to suffer: when David Bret released his Clark Gable book a few years ago he put out a press release (which became 'articles' as that's how it works) saying Marilyn Monroe quote "rarely bathed, bleached her pubic hair, had irritable bowel syndrome, and left dirty dishes and bits of food under her bed".  It spread as far as Page Six in the New York Post.  Of course Bret has admitted he makes up everything so needless to say its untrue, but the story spread anyways. 

THAT'S why it matters.

Don't count me as back yet.  But I will be.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Silents Talk: Fixed all broken links

Apparently Imeem died and I just found out.  And I don't like youtube but there's no choice.  So all the Silents Talk have been updated (if you ever find a dead link/vid/clip let me know).  The effected and now fixed ones:

Silents Talk: Theda Bara


Silents Talk: Norma Talmadge


Silents Talk: Rudolph Valentino

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Hala Pickford wins "Sex"


I love The Silent Movie Blog run by Chris Snowden of Unknown Video. Been following them since they were a 'blog blog '(at .blog.com). Chris recently ran a "Nail the Lie" contest, challenging his readers to pick which odd 'movie mag fact' was true or not. It was a tough one but this one stood out to me:


""The Regulars,” the cream of Hollywood’s feminine society, hosted a dance contest at the Cafe Montmartre in 1928. The winners by acclamation for the best Charleston were Joan Crawford and Buddy Rogers. The winners for the best foxtrot were Joan Crawford… and William S. Hart."

Everyone knows I despise Joan Crawford.  But I do know enough about her to know she would have been round 1928 and she was known for winning dancing contests, particularly the Charelston at The Ambassador.  Buddy Rogers (who I think was handsome and lovingly refer to as BFed) would have been at his own rising fame during that time.  So far it sounds true eh?

The ironic thing is thanks to The Silent Movie Theatre and their Western Silents month a few years ago I know a bit more about William S. Hart than one would assume.  My own old timer men love modern westerns, so naturally I don't.  They seem absurd to me.  But I did like William S. Hart and Tom Mix well enough.

William S. Hart was an old timer himself, having been born (likely) 1864 making him quite old by flicker days.  He was said to be a serious man (of legit theatre no less) and bailed on founding United Artists in 1919 because he was too scared of it failing.  He remained a loyal company man, meaning he would eventually get screwed, with Tom Mix making his slow Westerns look antique to children.  In 1925 he made his final film, "Tumbleweeds" and released it via United Artists.  Even though it did decently (and it is a good movie) he thought it was underpromoted and sued into oblivion over it.  He then retired to his ranch and had only one brief thing to do with film (recording a talkie intro to Tumbleweeds) until his death in 1946.

So he wouldn't have been sociable, he would have left Hollywood by 1928 and was definitly making no more films.  Add to that his reputation as serious and well...older.  My guess is William S. Hart would have had the same opinion of Joan Crawford that I do...

One other thing I realized after the fact was Cafe Montmartre was long out of fashion by 1928, in fact it may have been closed (can't remember)!  The still going 110 year old Frederica Sagor Maas (who met Joan Crawford on her arrival to Hollywood and called her an 'obvious strumpet') insisted in her autobiography "The Shocking Miss Pilgrim" that the owner of Montmartre deserved a star on the Walk of Fame and that fickle Hollywood had killed him off in favor of the Sunset Tower by the mid 20s.  Good one Chris!  Best part?  8 other people jumped in, but I was the first guesser, and the only one to get it right.  I'm so badass that way.

So I won a lovely Unknown DVD for my guess.  I have their Mabel Normand releases and those are all top notch.  I decided I had to chose the most obvious one, despite the temptation to pick an early Doug Fairbanks.  I won "Sex" with Louise Glaum.