Monday, October 26, 2009

Coquette Clips!

Okay...my DVD arrived today. You kiddies are in for a treat. Below are 3 clips for Mary Pickford's Coquette. Click here to read more about the film.

Now one warning: these are a tad spoileriffic. But...they are also some of the best acting she ever did.









PS: I realized despite seeing all of her talkies I've never written about my favorite, "Secrets". I shall do so tonight or tomorrow.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

The Underrated Coquette


So I finally was able to see Coquette...complete on the big screen (come to think of it that's the only Pickford talkie I've seen on a big screen)! Break out the confetti as this means I have now officially seen all 4 of Mary's talkies, despite even bootlegs being hard to find.

Coquette was released in early 1929, and is mostly remembered as "That film that unfairly won a token Academy Award" for Mary's performance. Film books love to repeat this story, citing Mary's shameless lobbying for the Best Actress award (complete with inviting the judges to tea at Pickfair). Mary was a founding member of the Academy, and her husband Douglas Fairbanks was the first president (and presenter of the Awards). 1929 is the year that Mary finally peaked...her popularity had been solidly stuck in 'superstar' mode since 1909. 20 straight years of wild white hot fame. And Coquette was the finale.

Given those circumstances its easy to see why people say "Oh she won it more as a lifetime achievement award poor Ruth Chatterton/Jeanne Eagels!" Hey Gloria Swanson never won an award either...get over it! But in fairness Mary's performance is quite breathtaking. No I haven't seen the other nominees for that year, but to say Mary won this award as a token symbol is very unfair. Even if her superstar status gave her an unfair advantage its still a hell of a performance, one tailor made for Oscar winning. They cut out the dead baby bit, but there's still a death and it packs a hell of a punch!

Maybe I'm just a sucker for any film that starts out with a teenage all American boy asking his black mammy for his 'afternoon cigarette with pop'. You can't make this stuff up!


Synopsis (Warning Spoilers Ahead!)

Mary plays Norma Besant, a flirtatious Coquette Southern Belle type. Norma comes from a prestigious family and adores her father Dr. John M. Besant (John St. Polis) and brother Jimmy (William Janney). Her father wants her to marry a nice respectable suitor named Stanley Wentworth (oddly enough played by Matt Moore, her ex brother in law). However Norma is over him, she recently met a man named Michael Jefferey (Johnny Mack Brown) and is madly in love with him.

However Michael Jefferey is a bit of a Jethro type, and Daddy does not approve. Norma and Michael confess their love to each other, with Michael vowing to go into the hills and 'make good' so they can marry and he can provide for her. He declares he'll leave for 6 months, at which time he'll return to marry her. Some amount of time passes (not the 6 months but awhile) and Michael (with the hell of Stanley) sneaks a kiss with Norma outside of a Country Club dance. Norma's brother and his flapper girlfriend (plus a beau or two) comes hollering for her, so she begs Michael to take her somewhere for a moment so they can have more time together. They go to his mother's cabin which is near by...and stay until 4AM. AND someone saw them! And that someone totally told everyone in town!

The next day Michael goes over to Norma's house and tells her about the innuendo spreading (we're led to believe Norma and Michael did nothing but talk and cuddle...Hays Code and all) and says he'll ask her father to let him marry her right now so as to save her reputation. But Daddy catches them hugging and (since he forbid her to see him ever again) is quite livid. They have a war of words while Norma begs them to stop. Michael leaves and well...it doesn't go well from here.

Later Daddy informs Stanley he's gonna go duel it out (including guns) with Michael. Stanley tries to have Jimmy keep Norma in the house as he's certain her intervening will endanger Michael's life further. Stanley goes to try and stop Daddy (see he's real upstanding like that) but he returns to the house telling Norma something bad has happened. Norma had a premonition before he returned, something about being shot. Indeed Michael has been shot by her father and the wound is fatal, though he's still alive. Norma is like a woman gone mad and rushes to his cabin.

There Michael lays dying, and Norma and him kiss a final time in front of many witnesses. Her Mammy takes her to another room where her father's lawyer begs her to lie when the police arrive, as its the ONLY way to save her father's life. Norma is so distraught she refuses in what has to be one of the best grief acting scenes ever.

Some time passes and we find Daddy is in jail, while Norma and Jimmy take care of each other at home. Jimmy still speaks to Dad, and Norma has tried though Daddy won't respond to her. Jimmy alludes to the hope that she will save Daddy, and Norma promises 'tomorrow on the stand' she will.

The prosecutions case has been that Michael was a good man working hard so he could marry Norma, and that he had proudly spoke of Norma to his fellow workers and shown her photo. Norma takes the stand and begins to lie, emotionally trying to say he was a brutish beast who raped her despite the truth and how heart wrenching it is. Norma breaks down and her father gets up to comfort her (apparently this was allowed back in the day). Her father says she is a good girl but its not the truth and he loves her. He also eyes the pistol on the evidence table. After consoling Norma he gets up and asks that her testimony be stricken from the record as its all lies, and he's willing to take his medicine. Then in front of everyone he shoots himself with the same pistol he killed Michael with.

Later we see Norma come out of the Judge's chambers assuring everyone she is okay. Stanley is waiting for her and asks if he can walk her home. Norma says no she needs to be alone...and walks home...alone.

Clips

Below are 3 clips from Coquette, in my opinion proving Mary deserved every bit of that Oscar









Review

I.love.this film. Mary's acting is superb and its easy to see why audiences loved it. In the beginning she starts out quite stiff...her accent is solid and believable but her acting is unusually self conscious. Mary reportedly fired Charles Rosher (her long time cameraman) during filming of an emotional scene early on. This makes me wonder about the early scenes as she doesn't look as youthful as usual (ex: Sparrows which was released 3 years earlier). The lighting isn't as good as it usually is. Despite this she's still pretty believable as a 19 year oldish girl. Frankly I think she pulled it off even better in Secrets a few years later.

The impressive part comes with the grief scenes. Mary's acting had never been finer and her vocalizations were very on the spot with what you would expect. Very VERY emotional. Not only is the acting impressive, but the technology as well. Its a very modern looking film, and thus its easy to forget that it was filmed probably in late 1928/early 1929. Microphones were so touchy then that most people couldn't even walk a certain way without setting them off. Jewelry was also a big trigger.

Yet here Mary is flinging herself around in the bedroom scene with what appears to be total disregard for the microphones. How they accomplished this in that year is beyond me but it is simply perfection.

Once Michael is dead you're pretty much hooked in. The court room scene is also another fine example of how wonderful she could act in talkies, and frankly its very believable and heart wrenching. I think more than anything I just loved the ending...her father and love are dead and she decides to walk home alone. This is a beautifully shot scene (Rosher?) with her walking out onto a dark street as the lights come on behind her. Most early talkies had to be very careful with scenery and camera movements. While its not as smooth as some of her later talkies its again quite impressive let alone for the year it was made.

The other actors are all pretty competent...and they carry the duller scenes in the beginning. Despite the use of a Mammy named Julia (Louise Beavers in the start of a very long career) there isn't really any racism. Julia is a bit sassy and seems to be a stand in mother. But shes not someone in blackface, and she speaks proper English. This in and of itself was quite ahead of its time.

Coquette was based on a popular Broadway play, made famous by Helen Hayes. The biggest difference between the stage version and the film version is the sex angle. In the original Michael and Norma have sex in the cabin and Norma becomes pregnant. Events follow as they do in the movie only when Norma feels like she's been shot that would be the cue for the miscarriage. The Hays Code would never allow this, so it was a touch sanitized.


Release, Oscars, and Talkies

When Coquette was released it did quite well at the box office and even before the Academy Award many seen it as a solid transition for Mary. Of her UA counterparts Mary was one of the first to jump into talkies. Not only did she jump but she seemed quite eager for it. Ironically its said by the 1930s she had a case of mic fright with her radio show, but maybe that came after quitting film. Charlie Chaplin, Douglas Fairbanks, and Norma Talmadge would all hold out as long as they could before making a talkie. Gloria Swanson made one last silent before making a quick talkie that was also a success and nominated for an Academy Award (The Trespasser). But Mary went first. And boy did she knock it out of the park.

Mary would go on to make 3 more talkies, but none were as successful as Coquette. Taming of the Shrew SHOULD have been, but that damn stock market crash did it in. Kiki was an abomination, and Secrets never did as well as it should have (now THAT is an Oscar performance!)

Despite the Oscar prestige it seems this film was lost to the realm of forgettable early talkies. In the 1930s it was bought for a remake (during this time when you bought remake rights you also usually bought old versions of the story as well) and thus left Mary's control. It was officially released on VHS though the old rights issue is preventing it from being officially released on DVD at the moment (none of Mary's talkies have officially been released, all are bootlegs). Luckily ioffer comes through again, and you can get DVD version by clicking here.

The Coquette Oscar was the subject of controversy last year when BFed's heirs tried to sell it (for charity). Supposedly some sort of private deal has been reached between them and the Academy though what that is no one knows yet. Perhaps one of the saddest things of all is both Mary's Coquette, and Buddy's Wings, both Academy award winning films, have not seen official DVD releases.

Today it doesn't seem Coquette gets screened much (let alone any of Mary's talkies) which is also a shame. With so few people seeing it that continues the myth that she didn't REALLY deserve her Oscar. I dare you to watch this film and still hold that opinion!

Friday, October 23, 2009

Silents Talk: The List

Below is a list of articles showcasing the voices and talkei careers of various silent film stars. With this series it is my sincerest hope to debunk the talkie myth (the belief that silent film stars all faltered because of funny voices when talkies came). Each article contains a talkie filmography, either film or sound clips from each star, and a verdict. This list will be updated when new articles are posted. If you have a silent star clip you'd like to share please contact us.






Silents Talk: Douglas Fairbanks


Now back to your regularly scheduled programming! I've decided to make a silents talk list, which you can view by clicking here.

Douglas Fairbanks
was so wonderful. I've nearly reviewed every Mary Pickford talkie (Coquette is coming soon yay!) and I was quite upset that I was unable to rip clips from "Taming of the Shrew" when I wrote about it. It really is a wonderful movie, and you kind of need to purchase it right now.

Along with Charlie Chaplin and his then wife Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks is the perfect example that the talkie myth was just that: a myth. His voice fit his persona perfectly, and despite his concerns his personality shines through just as well as it did in silents (perhaps even dare I say...better?)

"Taming of the Shrew" would be Doug's first talkie and you can read all about it here. Technically one could count the short prologues quickly added to "The Iron Mask" as a talkie but just barely. A lot of people seem to believe Mary's talkies were terrible, including Shrew. But that's just not the case (okay...Kiki is.) More than anything Taming of the Shrew was Doug's show. Mary's in it, and despite already having made a critically acclaimed talkie, she barely speaks at all. Doug's the carefree, always laughing Petruchio...stealing each and every scene he's in (not to say Mary's no good; her bits are quite funny too.)

Forgive the quality (the DVD has much MUCH better quality) but below is a clip of one of my favorite scenes. Petruchio has decided to marry Katherine (mostly for money) despite her scary Shrew reputation (literally this woman whips the piss out of men!) After telling her father he meets Katherine who he dubs 'Kate' (angering her greatly) and well...you see how well this works out:



Doug is truly a wonderful actor, despite what many people like to say. He's fun to watch, and quite entertaining. Unfortunately Taming of the Shrew would not be a hit, what with being released right after the stock market crash and all. Doug already had apprehensions about talkies (he felt it took the romance out of filmmaking) and it seems the medicore reception did not help.

With his marriage firmly on the rocks he made "Reaching for the Moon" in 1930. This movie is said to be so terrible (I need to order it) that its his own 'Kiki' (deep thoughts: Joseph Schenck convinced both Mary and Doug to make their worst films, back to back at that. Evil? Or just bad timing?) Well in fairness maybe it wasn't so bad to begin with: the film was originally meant to be a musical as was the fad when it was in production. However UA felt musicals would bomb by the time it was released...so the logical conclusion? Cut out almost all musical numbers and leave it be...resulting in a very very bad film. Needless to say it didn't do well.

Doug's marriage continued crumbling, and trying to find an escape from Mary and talkies he began to travel almost incessantly. Using this premise as an excuse he filmed a travelogue in 1931, "Around the World in 80 Minutes". It too did not do well. Doug made 2 last goes at real films, and neither did much at the box office. However it is said his final film "The Private Life of Don Juan" is quite good, and at the least (much like Mary's "Secrets") a proper goodbye for one of the greatest actors/producers of all time.

Doug didn't take the end of his marriage, fame, and career very well at all. He decided to capitalize on his son's ever rising star, with the idea to make films together. This never panned out and before Doug could really make up his mind about what to do he suffered a fatal heart attack in 1939. His death was quite sudden (he was only 56) and quite sad.


Doug's Talkie Career

*The Iron Mask (2 prologues) (1928)

*The Taming of the Shrew (1929)
*Reaching for the Moon (1930)

*Mr. Robinson Crusoe (1932)

*The Private Life of Don Juan (VHS only) (1934)


Only one of these films (The Iron Mask) has seen an official release. The rest are bootlegs. Click titles to purchase.

'Reality TV' Work

*Around the World in 80 Minutes with Douglas Fairbanks (1931)

Doug, once again being way ahead of his time, decided that he would film his beloved travels and make it into a film. The film is said to be a cross between your average TV show and a touch of reality TV, neither of which really existed at the time. Doug enjoyed this project so much he began work on another one, only to scrap it after finding the public wasn't too enthusiastic. The film still exists (not sure the scrapped one does) and is said to be terribly un PC. I don't believe its been released.


Verdict: Silent or Talkies?

The fact that history has forgotten Mary Pickford or Gloria Swanson is quite a shame, but the fact few remember Douglas Fairbanks today is a sin of epic proportions. His silent characterizations of Zorro, Robin Hood, and the Thief of Bagdad influence those stories to this very day. With Doug so forgotten no one has ever really had time to comment on his voice. The fact that none of his talkies were really a success doesn't help...even contemporary audiences probably wouldn't have remembered them.

When he passed, Doug was at an age where he could have become a behind the scenes type or more a cameo/character player (he probably would have hated that though...Doug was in strong denial about reaching old age). His voice matched his persona so well there is absolutely no excuse for his failure at the box office in talkies. Much like Mary it seems he just lost the will to fight, letting personal issues (and old age) overcome his will to try. I think he could have been a Sean Connery type had he wanted to.

I just adore Doug's voice! Everything about the man was so wonderful. Frankly though he was wonderful (and defined) in silents, I'm blown away by his performance in Taming of the Shrew. So...I think he was best in talkies. Which is odd because I don't think Doug would have agreed...

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Silents Talk: Anna May Wong


I love Anna May Wong. And I must confess until this post I had never heard her voice...and it was quite shocking!

Everything seemed to be against Anna, damn yellowface practices and what not. A woman wildly ahead of her time she would never get the stardom she so sorely deserved, though she had quite a long and well known career.

Stunningly gorgeous she had an acting style that at first reminds me of Mary Pickford, but evolved into something similar to a sexy Gloria Swanson. A third generation Chinese American, Anna was always torn between two worlds...and indeed her voice was one such battle.

Anna grew up speaking like a California girl, so much so even Chinese speakers told her she had too much of an accent. Tired of discrimination in the US she left for Europe in 1928. In Germany she made 2 talkies (I believe in both English and German, sadly neither appear to be on DVD) "Schmutziges Geld (aka Song or Show Life)" and "Großstadtschmetterling (aka City Butterfly)". These would be the only recordings of her natural untrained voice. While in Germany she also performed in an operetta, with the Germans praising her handling of their odd language (I say that lovingly as someone who has known many Germans).

Anna then left for England where she did one last silent "Piccadilly". While in England she performed in a play "A Circle of Chalk" to much fanfare and acclaim. However opening critics were not kind, dubbing her voice a 'yankee squeak'. Whether they were annoyed with the American accent or the fact a very Asian looking girl sounded like a flapper well...one can only guess. But Anna took it to heart and began intensive vocal lessons to give her a more 'refined' voice. This is the voice she made most of her talkies with.

In what can only be dubbed an odd situation, Paramount lured her back to Hollywood in 1930 with promises of overdue stardom. She made several important films during this time including "Shanghai Express" and "A Study and Scarlet". Below is a clip of the latter:



Here's another odd one (around the 8 minute mark) of Anna in technicolor showing off her fashions:



After losing the role of O Lan in The Good Earth to a whitey, Anna made a trip to China before trying Hollywood one last time. She made a few more talkies, all varying in quality and reception. In 1951 she became the first Asian American to have her own TV show "The Gallery of Madame Liu-Tsong" which is sadly lost (damn you Dumont!) Much like Gloria Swanson she went on to have quite a long career with its highs and lows. Apparently Americans didn't mind her voice however it came out.

Anna's Talkie Career

*Show Life (aka Song) (German) (1928)

*City Butterfly (German) (1928)

*The Flame of Love (3 versions: English, French, and German) (1930)

*Daughter of the Dragon (1931)


*Shanghai Express (1932)


*A Study in Scarlet (1933)

*Chu Chin Chow (1934)

*Java Head (1934)

*Tiger Bay (1934)

*Limehouse Blues (1934)

*Daughter of Shanghai (1937)

*Dangerous to Know (1938)

*When Were You Born (1938)

*King of Chinatown (1939)

*Island of Lost Men (1939)

*Lady from ChungKing (1942)

*Bombs Over Burma (1943)

*Impact (1949)


Many of these have been released on DVD or bootleg. Click titles to purchase.

Television Work

*The Gallery of Madame Liu-Tsong (1951-1951)

In addition Anna appeared on a handful of television shows between 1951 and 1961. Click here for a complete list.

Verdict: Silent or Talkies?

Isn't Anna fabulous in everything she did? Her voice did shock me a bit, being deeper and throatier (and extremely well enunciated) than I assumed it would. It's actually quite sexy, very Garbo. And in doing so it matches the image she had very well. I think it goes without saying she was quite successful in talkies. More than anything I think her acting peaked with the arrival of talkies, at least leading one to assume she was better in talkies than silents.

I actually have enjoyed her silents quite a bit. But in this case I'm gonna say Anna was a better talkie star.

Silents Talk: Lon Chaney


Ah yes it's back! I don't know why I've petered off on doing these...life and junk. For more Silents Talk click here.

Lon Chaney is perhaps one of the greatest silent actors ever. His make up skills are still a thing of envy today (including the slightly cringe worthy story of his Phantom makeup). The man was quite mysterious, insisting when off screen 'Lon Chaney' did not exist. There have been a few biographies written on him, though I have yet to read them (its on my list). Make up or no make up he was one hell of an actor...and his characterizations are heart wrenchingly wonderful.

Chaney was one of those actors where it probably wouldn't have mattered how he sounded. He was so versatile, I'm not sure anything could have stopped him....well except that damn throat cancer. In what has to be one of the most ironic and sad situations ever, Lon was diagnosed with throat cancer shortly after talkies arrived.

In fact he only lived long enough to make one talkie, a remake of one of his silent films, "The Unholy Three". Though I have yet to see the talkie version (which you can buy here) I have seen the silent version which is excellent. In fact its the perfect talkie premise: Chaney played a ventriloquist who uses his vocal powers to set up a jewel heist (even dressing as an old granny for a good chunk of the film!). Publicity for the film mentioned how he had to sign a contract verifying that 4 of the voices: his character's, the fake granny voice, the parrot voice, and the dummy voice were not dubbed and all his own vocalizations. Below is a clip of Chaney speaking as himself and the dummy:





Verdict: Talkies or Silents?

Well...in Lon's case I think he could have done just as well in either medium. Perhaps the one thing that would have limited him would be masking his voice as well as he masked his face. How would the Phantom speak? Or Mr. Wu? Or the batshit crazy manic depressive clown known as HE?

I think with Unholy Three, Chaney was trying to prove indeed he could do character voices...what's more character-ish than Grandma? It's just a shame he didn't live long enough to make another talkie...it's almost impossible to render a verdict without another character to judge.

That being said as usual Lon had a fine voice. Suited what we thought as him and it worked fine in the film. Though he will always be immortal in silents, I think he could have been immortal in talkies as well.

Monday, October 19, 2009

How to write a Silent Film Biography


It is my firm belief in this day and age that pretty much anyone could write a solid silent film biography if they wanted to. Okay some writing and internet skills help but...call me an optimist I like to think the youngins might take up the reigns someday.

I hate self proclaimed titles. A lot of people like to dub themselves 'experts' or 'authorities' or 'historians'. I like to think those are titles one can only earn, but that doesn't stop people from taking them. I could hear a million old gasp-y shocked breaths if I declared myself any of the above. Someone once went above and beyond to call me a quote 'amateur' over 'historian'. I never thought of myself in any such way but by that point it kind of irked me...I may be no Kevin Brownlow but I research everything meticulously. The Cinecon crowd might not like it but I probably deserve some such title or the other.

A lot of the same old gasp-y crowd would never give out tips, scared someone might usurp their area of expertise. I on the other hand encourage this. If you can go out and find something wildly new and groundbreaking about Valentino (and I mean ya know real and factual, not Vlad Kozlov or Kenneth Anger styled) then I will love you. If you go and write a biography on Renee Adoree (who I've always wondered about) or Anna May Wong (who sorely needs a good bio) again...more love. And maybe cupcakes.

I've tried to style the below advice so it can be used by someone who just googled and has never done a thing before. You blogger types take heed as well, I actually came up with an idea for a post like this when someone mentioned wanting to research an obscure film star for their site but did not know how. These skills are easily applicable online or in print. Frankly I'd like to see more of both. Come on kids...put your thinking caps on!


Before we begin:

1) It's helpful to hold SOME writing skills. If you aren't a mildly amusing writer then please find a partner in crime to help you. Nothing is sadder than a well researched bio with a dry prose...or even worse a poorly sourced one with a dry prose (ex: Graham Russel Hodge's Anna May Wong biography). "They did this, they did that, then records say they did this" does not a story, even on the internet, make. One of my favoritest examples of a GOOD bio is "Pickford: The Woman who made Hollywood" by Eileen Whitfield. Well sourced, and a nice read. Another favorite in prose but less so in research is D.W. Griffith by Richard Schickel (he literally made me laugh out loud at times).

2) NEVER EMBELLISH! Unless you are writing a novel or a screenplay there is no excuse to do so. Hollywood is full of embellishment and frankly no more is needed. Why bother anyways? The story of Olive Thomas is a good example. Really...why would you need to embellish something THAT scandalous?! But people do! Keep meticulous records of your sources and when writing cite and source every damn thing you can. A book without a notes and references section is no biography at all.

3) LOOK OUT FOR EMBELLISHMENTS! I can guarantee you 90% of everything already written about silent film contains one piece of fantasy or another. Especially if its pre 1999 (and even then!) These stars loved to have glamorously made up stories and names, and they would go above and beyond to get them. Even Census and Ship records might not give the full truth (in my general experience 1910 and onward usually is when the lies start slipping in). June Mathis shaved off 10 years, Nita Naldi made up a birth name and place, and several other silent stars are still lost in the census completely buried in their own mythology.

In addition to these logistical problems many books or articles written from 1920-1980 played off pure fiction. A general rule is almost to believe nothing without proof. Nothing is sacred: interviews, articles, records! That's a very key thing to remember especially in the case of interviews: people liked to lie whether it be for malice or mythology, and a lot of times they had their own personal agendas as well (cough Alice Terry cough). HOWEVER don't rule these things out! Via newspaper articles and interviews I found more about Nita Naldi's childhood than I ever thought I would. Via interviews with the sometimes reliable Adela St Rogers I found an interesting June Mathis anecdote. It's just a matter of sleuthing and seeing if the piece fits with other things you've found.

4) HOLLYWOOD BABYLON UGH! Seriously that damn book is responsible for 100% of the myths you'll run into researching silent film stars. This stuff has been repeated ad naseum so long its now fact. The other day an article was posted on a well viewed site saying how Karl Dane operated a hot dog stand outside MGM then killed himself (a Hollywood Babylon 2 story). This was ironically weeks after the wonderfully researched Karl Dane biography came out. The author of the piece wouldn't believe me that this hot dog thing had never happened as said. Kenneth Anger is that pervasive. So make sure whoever you are researching hasn't been mentioned by him, and if they have, learn the myth and debunk the hell out of it!

5) Internet skills! Don't be afraid! These things are easy to learn and usually there is help to be found at your local library or community center. After dealing with my own Grandparents (who believed a blog must be constantly reread from start to finish for 'changes') I've noticed anyone over 40 seems to psyche themselves up to a ridiculous point. It really sincerely is not that hard. Learn. Its so much easier than microfiche and a typewriter (or so I've heard!) PS: Back up everything. Be it by printing or zip drive or even email. You don't want to cry later.

6) Yes location sometimes helps. If you are in New York or Los Angeles it will be easier. BUT if you are in Podunk Iowa you can still write a solid bio (though a research trip might be needed, or a friend in those cities). Another thing to note is taking on a foreign born star might be easier than thought (or so I've heard in the cases of Karl Dane and Vilma Banky). You might have to look into something foreign anyways, but if you've picked a European born star don't be discouraged! These people (particularly dear Max Linder) need you the most! That being said if you have any foreign language skills consider finding something and translating...so many things are lacking in the English world (again Max Linder...and Pola Negri too!)

7) Money. Money sucks. Can you do this without spending a ton? Depends what and how and why. Personally I can't afford to do much out of pocket, which has limited me in certain perfectionist ways (damn Dutch Archives). Others have spent thousands to research something they may never see a return on. You could try for a major publisher (I'd like to see more of this in the future) but these days they don't usually do silent film books, and the few places that do wont give you money to do so (see below section on Publishers). Is it possible to research for free? YES! Again it just depends how in depth and who and what not. Honestly it's a case by case basis. My advice: do what you can, even if your budget is $0. Then at least you did what you could, or who knows maybe you'll be able to complete the project without spending a dime!

Who Should I pick?

I'd be surprised if you really sat down and started reading this without SOMEONE in mind. There is probably some star who has already struck you. Personally I think more is needed on everyone...so if you want to pick Mary Pickford to D.W. Griffith to Valeska Surrat well...yay for you! It's sorely needed.

I think some really lacking areas are the early stars (anyone who started 1909 to 1920) and especially women. On the other hand if D.W. Griffith doesn't have a proper biography then nothing is sacred. One important note: the big 3 (Harold Lloyd, Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton) have been done to death. No more is needed kiddies.


Where to Start

I hate to say it but I don't like to give one 'starting' point. Ask 10 silent biographers and they'd probably give you 10 different answers. Below is my slightly logistical attempt at organizing it, but you can arrange these steps in whichever way suits you best!

1) Other biographies and books

Sometimes you'll be lucky/unlucky enough to already have something written about this person. A google, amazon, or library catalog search should give you a list of books where the person's name is mentioned. Not only should you look for random bits (Hollywood Babylon, Silent Stars, so forth) but books on the person, by the person, and books on people around the person as well. If this is someone you're mildly familiar with then you might know where to go (ex: Pola Negri I'd get a Charlie Chaplin and Rudolph Valentino book). If not there might not be much to grab here. Remember the question everything rule...these books might be out of date or might be the very reason you're writing anything to begin with! But it might give you a good clue where to start.

As for where to get books: start at the library. If you're in the big cities you'll truly be blessed (LAPL is heaven for movie books!) If you're in a small town then that advice is probably useless (though an interlibrary loan might be possible). Amazon and ebay are the next steps. Amazon is usually the cheaper of the two but I'd try both. Odd fact: this is usually a very cheap endeavor or a very expensive one. For example Miriam Cooper's biography goes for under $14 while Mae Murray's goes for about $50. Some books go for pennies, others for thousands (such as Natacha Rambova's). If you have a costly subject I'd recommend fighting the library system as best you can, but sometimes its worth the investment (and hey you can always sell it later!)

2) Internet

Well this is usually a useless endeavor, but again it gives you a good idea where you're starting at. IMDB, Wikipedia, Youtube, outdated Geocities sites...all that good stuff. A google search will probably give you as much as you're possibly gonna get. In most cases these sites have nothing, or the general Hollywood Babylon spiels. Pretty much never trust anything in these searches (less its a really fabulous site like this!) but it does give you an idea what everyone assumes, and what people might be interested in learning about your star. Silent film forums might be helpful particularly places like Nitrateville.

3) Newspaper Archives

There are quite a few newspaper archives out there. Some of you may be wondering why I put this above something like Ancestry.com. Well...if you don't know the star's real name or location or age (and trust me few of you do unless someone has already done the leg work) then the newspaper might hold the key. This was the key with Nita. Her standard given birth name yielded no census results. Through the newspaper archives I found her family's names, 3 supposed birth names, and a few birth locations. With this information someone else was able to find her name in the census, something no one would have ever found without looking through the old newspaper articles.

One problem with most newspaper archives is they don't have the rights to the major papers (such as NY and LA), particularly Hearst controlled ones. I've done research without the major papers and its a pain in the butt. The major papers have the meat of what you're looking for, so however you can get to them you might as well start there. LAPL has a lovely list of the best databases. You might have to pay to join them if you aren't blessed enough to be in LA, but its still worth a look.

The first thing to do is type in the given name, and the years they were in the spotlight (ex: Nita Naldi 1919-1930). That should give a solid start. Take notes, and source everything. Once this is done (and it may take awhile) search the other chunks (ex: Nita Naldi 1930-1970). Even minor stars will yield many pages of results...so chunks are pretty much the only way to go.

Remember: not everything the star or their agents say is true...but again it gives you something to confirm or deny.

The best thing about this type of research is it can be done at home quite easily on your own time. However that usually means paying for a subscription to these sites. If that's not an option then I suggest checking with the local library, many of them do newspaper archives of some sort for free. LAPL is again wonderful that way. But even smaller libraries have been known to have such goodies.

If your doing a basic biography or doing an online article this is THE thing you need. Its worth the money. If you invest in nothing else then invest in this.

4) Historical Records

Ah NOW we do ancestry.com! Depending who the person is and how long they lived you might find anything from census records to ship records to certificates. For the record despite my intense attempts I've never been able to find any marriage certificates on ancestry leading me to believe its useless when going back to the 20s in that respect.

Through newspaper searches and other books you've probably found a name (or 3) for the star. They would literally embellish everything from age to birth location to name...so this can be quite tedious. Make friends on genealogy boards if you must. Take heart: some silent stars still haven't been found in the census (Mae Murray for one). Your best best is probably the 1900 census, as most stars weren't old enough to lie about much during that year (though on the other hand it does make them quite hard to find). By 1910 some embellishments start to sneak in and by 1920 and 1930 such things usually make them hard to find again.

If your star was born in another country you'll need to find those local records (surprisingly this is sometimes easier than US ones!) Birth, death, and marriage certificates are all something you will need to send away for, to the local county where the event occurred. Of the 3 you're probably only likely to find the death certificate. Don't rule it out though: sometimes those things can be quite eye opening! Newspaper reports don't always have the full story, so you might find an entirely new angle in acquiring these documents.

5) Film Archives

AH this is my own personal annoyance...mostly because it's so damn impossible and cloistered! Very few silent film stars have complete filmographies anywhere be it online or in a book (Olive Thomas was one such case: in 2004 only 2 films of hers were thought to exist. After the documentary 12 were found to exist...and some not on safety stock either!!!!!) Things are always being rediscovered or bootlegged...so its worth the research.

Click here for a list of film archives around the world. Nothing is as easy as it sounds. Even if the star only made films in the US their films could be flung to the farthest possible reaches of the universe...so the foreign archives are a must! The Nederlands Film Institute is a particular example, they seem to find all the cool stuff.

One key thing to do is make sure you have all the info possible...sometimes films had more than one name or release. The newspaper archive search should have really cleared up what and when for you. You might be surprised what you find...sometimes things are lost until someone searches for them!

As for acquiring prints or viewing copies well...that can get expensive (my one attempt would have been $100 for one film). It's more so worth it to grab what you can via youtube and bootlegs. Or one trip to the most relevant archive (UCLA, MOMA, and the Eastman house would probably be the easiest for US residents). For my Mabel Normand biography I was quite disenchanted with the fact the former publisher (I've since decided to self publish) wouldn't pay research costs, as I feel viewing a film is just absolutely necessary and relevant to writing about it (if indeed the film still exists). Others told me "Oh just write without it!" I feel that's a cheap way to go. At the very least make sure you can view their most relevant films, or in the case of someone like Theda Bara, their remaining films.

A lot of things are on DVD these days. Amazon and ebay usually have most of them. Sometimes they go out of print in which case Movies Unlimited is quite helpful. If you can get TCM then that too is a must. Bootlegs are a God send in the case of rarities. Grapevine Video, Sunrise Silents, Unknown Video, and Ioffer all have many rare silent films on DVD. Online don't rule out the Internet Archive (which is free and legal) and youtube (well the quality is shoddy but it might have some goodies). Sometimes weird things pop up: for the longest time there was a short clip of Norma Talmadge's talkie "Madame DuBarry" on youtube. You never know what you'll find!

6) Film related archives

Now this is the hardcore stuff! Believe it or not movie magazines from the era, scripts, production schedules, stills, unpublished memoirs...all sorts of goodies exist in film related archives around the world! Two really key ones are MOMA in NY and The Margaret Herrick Library in LA. Neither have a full search option online, so they might have what you need and you may never know it. My advice is to give them a call as especially in the Herrick's case, their email replies are quite slow. They cant do all your research for you, but they can at least tell you if they have this or that.

If you intend on writing a really solid print biography then a trip to either of these is a MUST. Many stars donated their memoirs and papers to places like these (and various Universities as well) so you will find very relevant info that is no where else. Important note: some of these collections require permission beforehand...and that can take up to a year to acquire! So speak with the library and see what you need to do, then plan accordingly.

One other neat thing to do is see various collections of costumes and memorabilia if possible. The LA Natural history museum holds a lot of such things (including Mae Murray's dress and Mary Pickford's curls). Might make for interesting photos as well.

On that very note places like the Herrick are key for quality photos: you need certain permissions to print photos if they are still under copyright. You also need the highest quality print possible. In both respects the Herrick can be helpful (though you do have to receive permission to reprint, but its quite doable!)

7) Other

Very VERY rarely will someone relevant still be alive to interview. Dear Doris Eaton (105 I believe) and Frederica Sagor Maas (109) are still alive. But most people who were or knew silent film stars are long gone...even their children! The best bets if you want interviews is to try any child stars still with us or descendants (I'd draw the line at great something or other...after that the memory might be too murky to be of use).

In some of the film related archives mentioned above you might find writings or sometimes video of a relevant person's memories. Just remember interviews and memories can be quite biased...and sometimes helpful. As with everything you'll need to discern fact from fiction.

Getting it out there


Publishers

Honestly it's quite hard to get a University publisher unless you're taking on a very major star (and even then sometimes!), or have some hellit good credentials/contacts. Major publishers are quite hard to get, even if you have a list of well received books under your belt. Simon and Schuster seem the most open, but only when related to Chaplin (praise be his name).

The big 2 for silent film related books are McFarland and BearManor...and sadly neither are quite ideal. McFarland's strong point is they'll pay for your ISBN and do the publishing work...but you won't see a dime off of your book (less it sells really REALLY well...really well!) They mostly work on getting their books in libraries and that's nice...but they always price their books at about $45-$50...which limits your audience (after all who is gonna pay $45 to read about Valeska Suratt or even say Olive Thomas?) They also never put books in stores, so again limiting your audience.

It's just...a very disappointing and frustrating way to go. But if you don't want to spend anything out of pocket and don't want to do some simple publishing work well...then they might be a good route to go. The quality of their stuff varies. Some McFarland books are wonderful and others are...terrible. God awful. Like many publishers they don't fact check. So being published that way won't gain you much in the way of credibility.

BearManor is much better. They do try and get their books in local bookstores and all the major online outlets. They have a solid quality roster and do some basic promotion. Their books also tend to be in the $20-$30 range making it much more accessible to a new reader. The one problem with them for a silent related author is simply this: they aren't silent based. They've done a handful of silent books, mostly on the big comedians or very obscure names. But their focus is more on the 30s and 40s. They're worth a shot, but not a guarantee.

My favorite option is self publishing. Even with my wild internet skills I was opposed to the idea until recently. Self publishing always conjured images of cheap and pathetic books hawked on forums. But apparently in the past few years some major gains have been made in this arena. The two favorites among authors are Lightening Source and Lulu. Lightening Source requires a bit more work on your behalf, but you get a bigger percentage of your sales and frankly it is the preferred route to go among rogue authors. Via either of these you can be listed on all online retailers (including Amazon and Barnes and Noble), set your own price, and you are in control of how your book is promoted. Sadly this isn't the 70s...if anyone is gonna promote your silent book no matter who you go with...well...its gonna be you. Important note on self publishing: never give over your copyright (never do that with ANY publisher), and frankly other than those 2 listed sites trust no one (other sites give you worse deals than McFarland, including Amazon's own self publisher).

I'm wild about this option because it opens the doors to all sorts of wonderful opportunities. An author would have to sell about 20 copies of a book to make back any investment (if they priced it in a decent range) which means a book on the most obscure person could possibly see the light of day this way. It also means we might get wonderful books we never would have under the old system. I eagerly await seeing how this option affects the Silent Film publishing world...it might be the very thing to resurrect it!

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Books update!


So I have some wicked news! Conversations with Rodolfo is preselling so well I'm moving the official release date to December 9th (so everyone can get it by Xmas!) Order now and it will ship first thing on the 9th. Editing is a boring process, but its nearing completion. Click here for more information/orders (and a an excerpt!). I'm super proud of it really...I finally wrapped the ending to perfection...almost made myself cry!

Then the crappy news. I think I shot myself in the foot with Perpetual Flapper...the DVD goody confused everyone and presales have been weak because of it (and presales are important because that's how I'm able to publish without eating from the garbage can for a year). So I'm fixing it: preorder "Perpetual Flapper" BEFORE January 1st, 2010 AND you will get the instructional DVD. The book will be released April 3rd, 2010 (yes I had to move it back a little). But if you order after the start of the year well...no special DVD for you! Click here for more information/orders.

Friday, October 9, 2009

What about Karl Dane?


I.love.Karl.Dane! He was one of the first subjects here at FTT and I have been very fortunate to speak with his biographer Laura Petersen Balogh. Laura's Karl biography has just been released via McFarland. "Karl Dane: A Biography and Filmography" is quite wonderful and I highly recommend it. Yes its McFarland priced, BUT it is just so wonderfully written and researched. And trust me I don't hand out that judgment lightly. Click here to purchase a copy.

In conjunction with The Egyptian Theatre here in Hollywood there will be a pretty major Karl Dane celebration October 18th. Laura will give a lecture and do a signing. To top it off there will be a screening of "The Big Parade" complete with the original score! Seriously you need to go if you're in the area. And if not you just need to buy one more copy of Laura's book to console yourself. Click here for more information about the event and tickets.

Laura was kind enough to do an interview for me. I must humbly prostrate myself here as I should have posted it a week ago. I may appear busy on the surface but I've recently received some crappy health news (rheumatoid arthritis...now no one will believe I'm in my 20s!) which unfortunately sidelined this a bit. So my apologies to both Laura and Karl! But here I am, so...buy her book already!


An Interview with Karl Dane's biographer Laura Petersen Balogh by Hala Pickford


HP: First off let me say this is a fantastic book! How did you discover Karl Dane?

LPB: I had always known who he was, since I’m a silent film buff. I had read Kenneth Anger’s “Hollywood Babylon 2” but all I knew about him were the tragic and sordid circumstances of his death. But he never really made that much of an impression until I saw the serial “The Whispering Shadow” in 2005. That’s the first time I heard his voice and I became intrigued because to me, his accent wasn’t so bad that he couldn’t work in talkies.

HP: What made you want to write a biography on him?

LPB: When I saw the serial I decided I had to find out more about him, but there was no biography available. I normally would have just given up and moved on, but I was so curious and felt such empathy for him, that I decided then and there to write one myself—despite the fact I had never attempted a book before.

HP: Wow that's quite impressive! Being your first book, what was it like taking on such an obscure topic for your first biography?

LPB: It was definitely tough! But I was so lucky since I met up with a retired British genealogist early in the process. His name is Hugh Watkins and he spends a lot of time in Denmark and knows Danish. He became intrigued about the project and decided to help me. We formed a bond and I hired him to visit archives for me when I couldn’t and he found lots of Karl’s records that help tell the story of Karl’s early life in Denmark.

HP: How long did you research the book? What was it like? What difficulties and joys did you discover while researching?

LPB: I did the research for about 3 years. I was still finding out small things while writing the book. I felt like an archaeologist, sifting through boxes of information in archives that no one had looked in for ages, piecing together a life from bare scraps. It was completely exhilarating. I’d wake up thinking, what will we discover about Karl today?

HP: Exciting! Where did your interest in silent film come from?

LPB: It’s a funny story! When I was in 4th grade, my teacher meant to give us an assignment to write a report on Frederick Douglass. Instead she wrote “Douglas Fairbanks” on the board. I raised my hand and asked her who he was, and she must have been in a bad mood—she just brushed me off. That made me extremely curious and when I got home I looked him up in the encyclopedia, and then headed to the library. From learning about Doug, I learned about Mary Pickford, then the Gish sisters, D.W. Griffith, etc. A new passion was born! At that time PBS was starting to show a lot of silent films and it was perfect timing since I got to see my new idols in action.

HP: What is your favorite Karl movie and why?

LPB: That’s a tough one! It’s hard to narrow it down to one, but I love seeing his available talkies, since it showcases the total actor. “Navy Blues” is a lot of fun, as is the short “A Put Up Job” with George K. Arthur.

HP: Karl led a very interesting life, starting as a mechanic in his native Denmark and ending up a tragedy in Hollywood. What do you think drove him? It seemed he was always seeking something new, some new adventure.

LPB: Yes, an article from the 20’s once described Karl as an “eternally dissatisfied man”, and I think that was pretty perceptive. He was very restless and loved from place to place, even in his early years, living in Lincoln Nebraska as well as Mildred, Kansas! He was always searching for something, some meaning, that eluded him, I think, as if it could be found outside of himself.

HP: Wow! He must have been restless to want to live in Kansas and Nebreska! He had a family in Denmark, a wife and 2 children. Yet by the time he was in America they lost contact. Did he ever regret that? Did he ever see his children again? Were you able to find what the children felt about this relationship?

LPB: As far as I know, Karl never discussed his family with anyone in America. When he died, no one close to him in the end knew anything about any relatives. And no, he never saw his 2 children again after he left in 1916, although when his brother saw him onscreen in 1926, he wrote to him in Hollywood, and re-established contact, and Karl wrote occasionally and sent money to help them out. But there were no visits back and forth, and Karl’s grandson said the family never discussed him much.

HP: What drove Karl to become an actor?

LPB: Karl had a troubled childhood. His parents fought since his father was an alcoholic and spendthrift and his younger brother died of cancer as a toddler. I think Karl was attracted to acting because he could escape into a world of make-believe. (You can probably tell I was a Psychology major, no?)

HP: Just a little! Karl quit film soon after he started. Why did he re-enter film in 1923?

LPB: His second wife Helen had died in childbirth along with their baby girl. The story goes that Charles Hutchison, who acted with Karl in the serial “The Wolves of Kultur” among others, saw Karl on the street and persuaded im to take up acting again since he was making his own independent feature.

HP: The Big Parade was a major success. How did Karl feel about that?

LPB: Karl always seemed pretty humble about his success in his interviews. He said at the beginning that he was aware that roles like that of “Slim” only came along once in a lifetime and he wasn’t holding any unrealistic expectations for long-lasting fame. He lived pretty humbly, at least at the beginning, still living at the same small apartment on Hollywood and Vine that he resided in before he was famous.

HP: Now Karl had a Danish accent but spoke English well enough (click here to listen). What happened when talkies arrived?

LPB: There was a lot of panic and apprehension at all the studios. George K. Arthur said that Karl never knew what hit him when sound film came in and was not prepared. Part of the reason may have been that MGM mogul Louis B. Mayer was known for telling his players that if they were loyal and worked hard, they would always have a job. Karl, probably due to his somewhat-shaky English, tended to take things very literally, and might have gotten a false sense of security about his job until it was too late. Karl was at his height when talkies came in, at about 1927.

HP: What made him all but retire from film? What did he do once he was out of film for good?

LPB: Karl claimed in an interview that he was offered a contract in 1930 but turned it down since he was suffering from total physical and emotional exhaustion and had to take time off to rest. He said he recognized that his voice was not ideal for talkies and that pantomime was his true forte and didn’t seem bitter at all. When he was out of films for good, he quickly turned his attention to gold mining. This was very popular in the early years of the Great Depression. However, he was swindled by one of his partners, who made off with a chunk of his savings.

HP: Karl's story is remembered mostly for a small blurb in the trashtastic Hollywood Babylon 2 saying he lost out on talkies due to his accent, ran a hot dog cart, and killed himself because of it. What really happened?

LPB: His voice wasn’t bad: it fit his physical appearance and was understandable most of the time. He could have made more films easily but the timing was terrible. So many things went wrong all at once: he was getting older (Karl was almost 40 when “The Big Parade” came out), public tastes were gradually changing, he was fragile emotionally, and most of all he made terrible decisions and saved none of his money.

HP: In addition to being swindled by his business partner Karl was pick-pocketed the day before he died. Do you think had he not been swindled and robbed he wouldn't have chosen such a sad ending?

LPB: Yes, I personally think if he had a decent living he could have soldiered on, despite any other problems he was having. He had borrowed so much money from his friends that he probably knew he couldn’t ask anymore—everyone was having a hard time in those years. He was probably close to being kicked out of his apartment—after all, he had only $1.57 (about $16 in 2009) at the time of his death.

HP: What happened after he committed suicide?

LPB: People had very strong feelings about his death from all the articles that appeared in American and Danish papers. Some were extremely sympathetic, condemning people who had helped his spend his money when he had wealth, but turned their backs on his when he lost everything. Others were very cruel, calling him a “failure” since he had no money at the end, and insinuated that he never had any real talent all along, that his earlier fame and fortune as all due to luck. It’s amazing to read this collective amnesia since all of these people surely had seen films like “The Big Parade” only a few short years before. The controversy also caused some actors to start paying more attention to their own finances.


HP: Well at least maybe something good came out of something so sad if others learned from his fate. What is the status of Karl's films now? Is he easily accessible or locked away in the vaults?

LPB: We’re actually lucky since we have a good sample of Karl’s films available to us today, like “Parade,” “”Trail of ‘98”, and the newly discovered “Bardelys the Magnificent,” but so many of his films also sit in vaults. One example is first Dane and Arthur film “Rookies” which exists in good condition and has never been released. This is supposed to be a great film and I really am dying to see it (Hala adds: are you listening festival and screening programmers? Come on!)

HP: What do you think Karl's legacy is right now? And what do you hope it will be in the future?

LPB: Much of the general public doesn’t know who Karl Dane is, but I’m very optimistic. As more films are released on video and DVD, he’ll find more of an audience with future generations. I hope this biography will encourage people to see more silent films in general, and give the medium a chance in todays’ reality-TV world.

HP: Silent film has been mostly forgotten since the 1930s, and most of Karl's work is silent. What do you hope modern audiences would see in his performances? In my experience when the Silent Movie Theatre ran "Son of the Sheik" last summer the packed crowd of hipsters just loved Karl. When Karl came on the screen for the second time the formerly cynical guy behind me commented "That guy is great!" Warmed my heart!

LPB: That warms my heart too!! I would hope that they’d see the wonderfully versatile and talented performer he was. Karl wasn’t some buffoon that people made him out to be years later. I’d advise them to check out his early works like “My Four Years in Germany” and the serial “The Wolves of Kultur” in which he plays TOTALLY against his later comedy type.

I felt the same joy when we showed parts of “Trail of ‘98” at the DFI in Copenhagen. When we showed a scene of Karl’s character flying into a rage and giving the villains their comeuppance by tearing their lair apart in a huge brawl, the audience (which included Karl’s family) loudly cheered.

HP: With such an acclaimed biography under your belt are you planning any more books? What about?

I definitely want to write another bio, and I have a few ideas I’m exploring, but I don’t want to jinx it yet!


More Karl Dane:

"Karl Dane: A Biography and Filmography" by Laura Petersen Balogh is out now on McFarland. Click here to purchase. Laura's Karl Dane site can be found at http://www.karl-dane.com Laura's Karl Dane article for The Rudolph Valentino Society can be found by clicking here. Another interview with Laura can be read at Perpetual Prose

Egyptian Theatre 87th Anniversary Celebration Information:
*
The Great Dane: The Tragic Life and Career of MGM Silent Comedian Karl Dane Lecture Starts at 5pm
*Book signing and cake starts at 6pm
*The Big Parade complete with original score starts at 7pm

Tickets are $9-$12 with special discounts for Art Deco Society of Los Angeles members

For tickets and information click here and here

The True Story of June Mathis

Long, long ago, when Forget the Talkies was something I was sure would fade in a month, I did one of my first articles on June Mathis. Who you ask? Oh only one of the most important women in film history ever, let alone the silent era! She was one of the first female producers, and it seems the first female film executive. Today she is almost solely remembered for 'discovering' Rudolph Valentino. For that alone she deserves a monument.

I admire the hell out of her. Much like Mary Pickford I find her business dealings fascinating. To this day there are very few women behind the scenes in film (or any industry for that matter)...so imagine how it was in the 1920s! As part of the Rudolph Valentino Society articles I finally updated June's. Its lengthy but this is the first time a lot of this stuff has reached the interwebs, or the light of day for that matter. While Dark Lover did her a decent job most other books have not, and of the 3 major female writers from the silent era she is the only one to not have a proper biography. Click here to read the full article. It's almost Nita mind blowing. Some tidbits:

*I'm not fully convinced June was the first female producer as she is so often lauded. Mary Pickford technically won that title in 1915. And Helen Gardner won it in 1912. Helen is probably the first even though she was almost forgotten by 1915. June didn't become a producer until probably 1917.

*Mary wasn't really an executive until UA was formed in 1919 (one might argue about her time at First National in 1918 but she wasn't really an executive, one could also argue about Clara Kimball Young but she never had any real power and she was never an executive at a major company). June became one by 1918 which does indeed make her the first woman to hold that title. Despite popular belief, even after Ben-Hur she was an executive at First National where her Colleen Moore comedies did exceedingly well. She was making $1,000 a week at that time (quite a high salary for someone not in front of the camera, most writers made $250 a week)

*Judging by the evidence I think she did have a relationship with Rex Ingram. Then Valentino came along. I don't think June had a romantic relationship with him BUT the friendship alone was enough to rile Ingram up. He eloped with the air headed Alice Terry and the two went off happily sabotaging their careers and being bitter until the day they died (mostly at Valentino, I haven't heard them say much about June though it might be out there somewhere.)

*She wasn't a fat, frumpy, old frau as so often portrayed. True she wasn't Anita Loos hot but she wasn't some sad frauen either. Mathis' weight came from a heart condition that she was born with, it would end up killing her in the end.

*In 1926 she was voted the third most important woman in the film industry, behind Mary Pickford and Norma Talmadge. Not only did she beat out Gloria Swanson and Lillian Gish but the 3 other top female writers as well: Frances Marion (Mary Pickford's films, Son of the Sheik), Anita Loos (Gentlemen Prefer Blondes), and Jeanie Macpherson (Cecil B. DeMille's films).

*SOMETHING happened in 1924 between her and Valentino...what...I do not know. Click here to read more about that. It's terribly fascinating.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Conversations with Rodolfo and Perpetual Flapper: both ready for preorders!

So yes, I'm *thisclose* to being a legitimate non web author. 2 of my books are ready for preorders, and I'm hoping you loyal readers will place a few. Since I'm not a fan of silent publishers I decided to self publish on 1921 PVG Publishing. Which means each book costs me about $300 to get out there. So...preorders help make sure I wont be eating out of garbage cans for the next few months. I'm really proud of both of these books, so I'm hoping you all will love them too. Preorders can be shipped by December 9th, 2009 if requested (Christmas! But please mention that when placing your order) otherwise the general release date for both books is February 1st, 2010 (both will be available on amazon.com and all such bookstore sites). And yes, they ship worldwide!

For those of you with your blogs and twitters and what not, I'd appreciate it if you spread the word. I'll love you forever if you do!

First up my novel:


Conversations with Rodolfo by Hala Pickford
Click here to preorder (and read an excerpt!)

About
Silent film legend and icon Rudolph Valentino died unexpectedly at the age of 31 in 1926. His sudden death launched a type of mass hysteria that had never been seen before. For many decades it almost seemed his death overshadowed his life, complete with an 83 years running memorial service.

Some argue that it was a shame for him to die so young, while others are certain talkies and the depression would have done away with his fame anyways. Still others are certain he could have gone on to some icon like status without an early death, ala Chaplin or Louise Brooks.

This got Miss Pickford to thinking...what if indeed Rudy had not died in 1926 yet lived a long life? Would it have been for the better? Or for the worst? Would his fame have continued? Or would he have ended up lost in time? That is the focus of Conversations with Rodolfo.

Synopsis:

After losing his job, 20 something reporter Michael Johnston discovers something incredible. The girl he has been seeing, Gloria, is the granddaughter of the film star Rudolph Valentino!

Amazed to find the 100 something year old star still living Michael asks if he can interview the man who now calls himself "Rodolfo". Despite Gloria's protests Rodolfo is eager to tell his story, which spans the Roaring 20s to the present day. Both Gloria and Michael will soon discover there is a lot no one knew about this iconic actor...

Instructional Book:

Perpetual Flapper: The Girl's Guide to recreating the looks and fashions of 1909-1931 by Hala Pickford

Click here to purchase

Perpetual Flapper: The Girl's Guide to recreating the looks and fashions of 1909-1931 is an instructional book designed to help women recreate the looks of vamps, flappers, Shebas, and baby vamps!

Each look will contain instructions and historically accurate information on:

*Hair

*Make up

*Fashions

*Accessories

*Pop Icons

*Modernizing the Look

Make up and hair instructions will be given in their original vintage format as well as a modern way so women can easily recreate the looks without trying to decode the historic terms and slang.

In addition to the easy to use instructions many wonderful tips are included such as which brands to use, where to shop, and modern Hollywood makeup secrets! Whether creating a costume or an every day look Perpetual Flapper is sure to have just what you need!

In addition to the book there will also be an instructional DVD available for free for those who place orders before December 2009. When ordering please specify in your checkout whether you would like the DVD or rush shipping. You HAVE TO PREORDER to either get an early copy OR DVD. If you order after December 2009 you will not get a DVD.