Monday, March 23, 2009

Warner Brothers: Releasing 41 (mostly) rare silent films and early talkies on DVD!


OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Seriously this is the coolest news ever. Thanks to a tip from Harold Aherne I've found Warner Brothers is releasing 41 (mostly) rare silents on DVD. Below is a list he compiled:

Scaramouche (1923)
Souls for Sale (1923) (a rare film with many cameos including a behind the scenes look at the lost Greed)
The Red Lily (1924)
Exit Smiling (1926)
The Temptress (1926) (a fantastic vamp picture with Greta Garbo!)
Love (1927) (John and Greta!)
The Red Mill (1927) (Marion Davies in one of her few official DVDs)
Spring Fever (1927) The Smart Set (1928)
The Trail of ‘98 (1928) (with Karl Dane AHHH!!!!)
The Kiss (1929) (I believe another Greta)
The Single Standard (1929)
Wild Orchids (1929) (a terrible Greta movie...seriously it's horrible)
The Big House (1930)
Dance, Fools, Dance (1931)
Laughing Sinners (1931)
Possessed (1931)
Private Lives (1931)
The Beast of the City (1932)
Emma (1932)
Rasputin and the Empress (1932)
Strange Interlude (1932)
Tugboat Annie (1933)
Chained (1934)
The Church Mouse (1934) Laura La Plante!
Forsaking All Others (1934)
Men in White (1934)
Ah, Wilderness! (1935)
Cain and Mabel (1936) (Marion talkie!)
The Devil Is a Sissy (1936)
Love on the Run (1936)
The Toast of New York (1937)
The Citadel (1938)
Mannequin (1938)
The Shining Hour (1938)
The Shopworn Angel (1938)
Three Comrades (1938)
Too Hot to Handle (1938)
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1939)
The Ice Follies of 1939 (1939)
Idiot’s Delight (1939)
On Borrowed Time (1939)



This is FANTASTIC! If you go to WB's shop site you can pretty much order all of them now. This is a little different than a typical release: these DVDs are made on demand. Meaning if 3 people order them in a week 3 copies are made up. WB has a FAQ about it here. And my apologies to international fans but no you can't order if your outside the US (and reportedly maybe Canada too). Maybe Ebay soon?

I think this is just the greatest thing ever, and I would highly recommend everyone purchase as many as they can. If this program does well it might spawn copycats...and maybe someday we'll have a good Four Horsemen DVD or Kiki (well...wait never mind). When purchasing enter the code XB392 which will save you 25% through the end of March 09.

Update: Rumor has it these DVDs will soon make it outside the US, and 20 additional silents are in the works. Nothing confirmed yet but we'll see!

Complete Filmography: Valeska Suratt Redux

A long while ago we featured the story of Valeska Suratt (aka Valeska Surratt...you'd think this is a recent problem but even her clippings couldn't decide which spelling!): the vamp who had 0% of her films left and in fact no one was sure how many films she had been in to begin with (5 to 12 was the general estimate). I'm currently going through the newspaper archives for Mabel and thought 'Hmm well this could be fun to settle'. So I took a break and decided to shed some light on Valeska's story.

First off we didn't do too bad with the filmography. What is right vs what we had listed is preeettttty close. Release dates are based off when they first appeared in the newspapers, and I'd like to remind everyone that the way films were released was well...complicated to us modern folk (usually there was a 2 or so year run, and many were reissued. The Soul of Broadway was being screened in 1919!) Again the old listing was close, but this is what I'd dare call the official Valeska Suratt Filmography.


*Photo courtesy of Hugo Bartoli
The Complete Valeska Suratt Filmography List
Purple means fully exists
Blue means partially exists or a clip exists
Pink means lost

1915:
The Soul of Broadway (October)
The Immigrant (November)

1916:
The Straight Way (October)
Jealous (November)
The Victim (December)


1917:
A New York Peacock (February)
She (April)
The Slave (June)
The Siren (June)
Wife Number 2 (July)
A Rich Man's Plaything (October)



A few notes on the differences. The Immigrant was her second film and was just a month after Soul of Broadway. She never did make a film called "The Kreutzer Sonata". There was a film with that name released in 1917 but it did not star her. "She" barely got any ink at all when it was first released and had a really stretched out run. Judging by the months FOX must have worked her through late 1916 and released all her films in one final go. She later would claim she hadn't worked on a film since November 1916.

Most of 1917 is just articles about her various films making the rounds. She began her work with the troops and also her beauty company (complete with newspaper columns/ads) selling things like 'Valeska Suratt Face Powders'. By the start of 1918 she was back onstage in New York performing in "The Purple Poppy". No mention was made of why she was back on stage or if she had quit films. Her beauty articles continued and by May it was announced she had left the stage because she had taken ill (influenza?). The article claimed she had left vaudeville forever and might return to 'photoplays'. Apparently not because by August she was back doing The Purple Poppy which continued through the end of 1918. Ironically in May 1919 she did an interview which appeared in several papers, claiming she had quit pictures for good and that the kleig lights had left her blind for random periods of time (quite believable).

She kept herself in the headlines through 1922, still swearing she was done being a 'vampire'. After that she disappears for quite awhile despite her predictions of becoming like Ethel Barrymore. What's even more interesting is her lawsuit with Cecil B DeMille didn't even turn up much press! An article in 1937 speaks of movies and lawsuits and mentions the case. It says she sued him shortly after the release of the film (10 years earlier) saying he plagiarized the story she had written. According to the article the case was thrown out as the court ruled she had 'plagiarized her story from the Gospel of St. John'. Which makes one wonder what exactly did DeMille really do? Other sources say the suit was quietly settled...lord knows what went on!

I still like what I call the 'Posh Spice Angle' of Valeska. She was on Broadway before entering films and even then her publicity made note of her fashions (14 costume changes, etc). At the height of her film career I found two articles that were quite fabulous. One claimed she had 920 gowns or as they put it '100 a film'. A later article upped the number to a round 1000. The 920 one claimed she bitched after acting out 3 (going on 4) scenes in the same gown, saying her fans wouldn't find it believable. Fantastic!

Added bonus: an Indiana paper recently did a well researched article on Valeska. Click here to read.

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Douglas Fairbanks Exhibit: Pictures and Review!

Believe it or not that's a whole wall! Last Friday was the first of two Douglas Fairbanks screenings held by the Academy. I was glad to get another chance to see Doug and Anna May Wong on the big screen in "Thief of Bagdad". Unfortunately I was late (Mabel), hit traffic (damn Hollywood), and had trouble finding the parking garage (damn Beverly Hills). I made it in right about the time the purse argument was going on, so unfortunately I missed Kevin Brownlow's introduction. I can guarantee I'll be going early on Monday for "The Iron Mask".

The Samuel Goldwyn Theatre is HUGE...probably the biggest I have seen here in LA. It was near 80% full and it was a really lovely mix of ages and genders and such. Everyone seemed to really enjoy the film, which looked lovingly restored and the score was fantastic. I kinda wish they'd had an actual orchestra (now THAT woulda been something!) but I'll take what I can get.

After the screening they announced the "First King of Hollywood" Exhibit would be open for another hour or so for those who wanted to see it. Oh my was it CROWDED! EVERYONE seemed to want to go through it, which made for some awkward maneuvering. I've been meaning to see the exhibit before it closes in April so this was a nice bonus.

Unfortunately what with taking pictures and the crowds I didn't get to thoroughly enjoy it. Its several rooms long and has neat little cards explaining things along the way. Lots of pictures and artifacts and I believe 3 film exhibit parts as well (documentary, newsreels with Mary, talkies and final silents). The film bits were where it was the most crowded. It was funny I was taking pictures of the production artifacts part and all of a sudden I heard a voice. A lot of people stopped and looked and there was a clip from "Taming of the Shrew". Mercifully they didn't have Mary speak (my what a wrong impression THAT would have given for her!). I always liked Doug's voice, he needs a Silents Talk one of these days.

For that matter I've always liked Doug. He's not my lord and savior like Chaplin nor my true love like Valentino, but I definitely enjoy him. He's just so damn charming on screen...I don't see how you COULDN'T like him! I also think its unfair people say he 'wasn't a good actor'. Definitely not the greatest, and he didn't go to great lengths to show he could act, but he could when he felt like it. His ''character'' (much like Mary's little girl or Charlie's tramp) was the little energetic boy who had wide gestures and did wild stunts while getting crushes on similarly childlike girls (this time a Princess). The wide gesturing turns a lot of people off acting wise (though it does convey how fun he was) but there are moments in his films where he goes for serious and it does prove he had that ability. He was on Broadway before film ya know...

Anyways here's some pictures with some commentary! My apologies if I cant label everything, I didn't have much time to take notes!





I can't remember which film this was from but it was an early one, with full approval from Beth apparently! Well...Mary had good taste! Thanks to Harlett O'Dowd for pointing out its the opening shot of "The Half-Breed" from 1916.


This is a working ''script'' of how they would film during that day.





One of those pictures where you wonder what they talked about: Valentino, Hays, and Doug. I think Doug wanted to be Valentino and Valentino wanted to be Doug. Some of the pictures in the exhibit back this up. Apparently Doug didn't like Valentino at first, but they made their peace eventually.


This is a drawing for the set design of the Thief of Bagdad dining room.

And then Doug spoke! Taming of the Shrew playing



Boots from I believe Robin Hood


AHHH its the bull from The Gaucho! Looks a lot less scary here...

Of all the pictures to not come out this one is a shame. That's the dagger Doug used to hold Anna May Wong hostage in Thief. Its really pretty in person. Thanks to Ian for cleaning the pic up a bit!

Some more set drawings...all from The Iron Mask






A curling iron used in Taming and I think Dorothy Vernon as well.


Doug and the almighty Chaplin!



Mary's having a bad hair day here...well thankfully it's a weave! This is from "The Black Pirate" when she stepped in for the final kissing scene.


3 love letters from Doug to Mary. He had VERY illegible handwriting...and according to the commentary he didn't like writing much anyways. They were sweet little letters, I believe from right around the time they were 'on' again.


People watching the newsreel exhibit



The key from The Black Pirate


Doug at the Egyptian!


An extra costume from I believe The Iron Mask. AMAZING detail!



Doug's costume from The Iron Mask (it has been altered a little over the years for other productions)


See its very Valentino!


The Iron Mask and some coins! Sorry I didnt get a picture of it but in this box is also a fleur de lis branding device. Apparently there was a scene where the bitchy criminal lady gets branded...but it didnt make the final cut (or was never filmed, we dont know.)


These were props from various films. The one on the left is from Thief of Bagdad. They didn't know what the broom was from.


Valentino-esque part 2!


Note the Doug cigars on the bottom right corner. He endored his own brand of cigars and smoked like a chimney...which probably didnt help his health in later years.






Friday, March 20, 2009

Happpppy Birthday...to US!


AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!! Today Forget the Talkies is one year old! Considering I've barely ever kept at anything in my life beyond the Spice Girls well...this is fantastic. Especially considering the great things we've done in the past year. Happy highlights:

*Proved Anna May Wong was not buried in an unmarked grave (thanks to a reader!)

*Put John Bunny back in the spotlight with the help of Anthony

*Got a Valentino month scheduled at the Silent Movie Theatre
(which kicked off Sheik Week here)

*
Put Miriam Cooper on the web

*Debunked both
volumes of Hollywood Babylon (one of our finest moments)

*Solved a
few Olive Thomas mysteries (though there are so many to go!)

*Our
Silents Talk series proved that the talkie myth never happened, and that most every silent film star had a fine voice


What else have we done? Well this website hasn't been updated much this month at all. But with good reasons (besides strep throat...that's a bad reason). I've been volunteering a lot here in LA for silent matters and more of that will be postable soon. But for now some MAYJAH news:

*With the help of the Art Deco Society of Los Angeles, The Egyptian, and Laura Petersen Balogh there will be a major Karl Dane event later this year. Obviously details to come (added note: there are some great 100 years of film celebrations scheduled as well...also to come!)

*The Silent Film Wiki is in the process of being majorly updated into a format I am sure will be much more agreeable to authors. I am really excited for this as its looking very nice.

....and....



*I am currently writing and researching Mabel Normand: The Keystone Queen. Honestly it's going to be fantastic as you all know what a stickler I am about biographies. Mabel is an extremely complicated figure in film history...and honestly I can see why the last attempt was the one and only 1981 book. But its a journey I'm willing to take. And its also a journey that might cut down on posting output. However don't worry...I'm still here and FTT is not going anywhere! We have a lot of legacies to restore!

I'm very very excited about our second year. Obviously the Griffith site and Valentino Fest will be coming into play, alongside the book release. A lot of people have asked me if I ever plan to do the Olive bio (what June never existed?) I do...but if Mabel is obscure her drinking buddy is even MORE so. I did start research on both subjects awhile back, but had to put it on hold. Maybe that will be year three's release?


So Happy Birthday to our site! Can you ever imagine a day we weren't here making snarky comments and mewing over how gorgeous Valentino is? I thought not.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

We're back...and pretty!

So as you may have noticed we've been on and off the last few days. Thankfully we were able to put up a little warning but honestly it drives me MAD when the site is inaccessible and coming up dead linked.

So we cancelled the move to wordpress. Frankly...they suck. You can't make the site pretty, and they want all 800 tags featured on the right. I didn't like it. And unfortunately it just made this all the harder. The feeds and everything are nice and fixed, so everyone should be fine. If you haven't subscribed you should.

I did keep my promise, the site is much more umm 'elderly friendly' (I kid I kid. You know my someday husband Charlie Chaplin is almost 130...old people are great!) The original layout (which I still adore) was made to resemble an old movie. This one is made to be edgy with a simple background so its easy to read. Also the layout is much prettier and fancier...I like that! You may notice the little black box at the top right, if you click the little tabs it shows the contact list, the affiliates list, the silent star sites, and our sister site http://perpetualflapper.blogspot.com/ .

Very spiffy! And just in time for our anniversary in 2 days! Check back as there is some MAJOR news that day!

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Pickford Review: The Horror that is Kiki


I finally got to view Mary's Kiki today...and it was very very...interesting. I believe it is possibly the most obscene thing ever committed to film (and not only have I viewed Sextette but a preview of Bruno as well!) Unlike Sextette I didn't sit there open mouthed unable to comprehend what I had just saw. With Kiki it was more sad than anything. It was like watching several deaths all at once: BANG the Little Girl BANG Mary Pickford BANG Silent film. And in several ways it literally was: this was one of Mary's biggest failures, and though not her first grown up role it was quite a definitive one. Horrifyingly definitive. I'm a big fan of 'get these films out where they can be seen'...but honestly if this one never makes DVD its probably for the better...I'm surprised Mary fought Rosita so hard...I think THIS is the one I would have burned.


Plot

Rehearsals are in order, and as the chorus girls practice business goes on about them. The star of the show Paulette Vaile (Margaret Livingston) is having a hissy fit and refusing to go on. The apparent honcho Victor Randall (Reginald Denny) is having it out with his frenemy Alfred Rapp (Joseph Cawthorn) over the matter to the beat of the music. Through this argument we find Victor had once been married to Paulette, and Alfred seems to be her pet and sweet talks her way back into his heart from time to time. They seriously go on and off every 5 minutes despite being divorced. Alfred and some other office folk tell Victor he needs a woman around, if not Paulette then someone.

Meanwhile some uproar occurs and a girl is thrown out the door on her butt. She starts screaming in french at the stage hands but to no avail, she's been fired. She is KIKI (Mary Pickford)! Sashaying her way up to the office she picks a fight with Alfred, and sweet talks her way to Victor. She bullshits him left and right about what happened, and he says hes sorry but he must stand by his stage hands decisions. She sweet talks him more, then throws a tantrum, and gets her job back. She opens her purse to get her powder puff and out falls a bunch of newspaper clippings of Victor, revealing she is in love with him. He seems to not notice or care as he just wants her out of his office as she seems a tad insane.

Kiki gets her job back, and Paulette agrees to go on with the show. The show begins and Kiki becomes distracted when she realizes Victor and Alfred are watching her. She becomes so distracted she messes up the entire routine, looking like it was a comedy bit when in reality it was just a disaster (including pants falling down and a drum on her butt!) After the show she again gets fired, and again sneaks into Victor's office where for some reason he has been all night refusing to go to bed...I don't know it didn't seem very clear. Maybe he was drunk. Kiki tries to sweet talk again and he says he wont give her job back, but he'll let her live with him if she'll agree to be his girlfriend. It really makes no sense since he doesn't seem to even remotely like her. Kiki is actually reluctant (again it makes no sense) but ends up going with him anyways.

At the apartment drinking (or is it MORE drinking) commences and Kiki is all ready to fall in love until she realizes Victor is staring lovingly at the portrait of Paulette BEHIND her...breaking her heart. She gets upset and he apologizes, then puts the moves on her. Kiki freaks, smacks the hell out of him, and locks herself in his bedroom. She then has a talk with another portrait of Paulette vowing she will make him love HER and not that skank. The next morning the soon to be long suffering servant Eddie (Phil Tead) tries to serve breakfast, and Kiki goes so ape shit on him I wonder if she is possibly bi polar. She steals a telegram from Paulette, something she keeps up till the very end of the film. Victor goes all weird too, telling Eddie to kick her out. He fails (as she is insane) and we find a week later much to Alfred's amusement Kiki is still there and Victor cant make her leave and he believes that Paulette hasn't contacted him at all like she usually does (though she has, Kiki as said is hiding the letters). He tells Alfred to get rid of her and Alfred kinda tries but he fails as Kiki charms him.

After being charmed Alfred reveals the letters thing, and Victor confronts Kiki. He ends up thanking her, as he kinda needed to get over that skank. However this very convenient moment Paulette calls (in fairness Alfred told him about it like 20 mins before) and Victor melts all over again. Kiki tries to interrupt the phone call, but only kinda succeeds as Victor ends up telling Paulette to meet him for dinner. They argue more and he leaves for his dinner. Alfred comes and eventually gets the loon to leave.

However down in the lobby she sees the crazy couple and in a VERY bold moment gets herself alone...in a locked room...with Paulette. She goes ape shit on her and literally PULLS A KNIFE on her then proceeds to chase her round the room! It is possibly the most amazing thing I have ever seen in my life. Paulette gets rescued, and Kiki feigns a fainting. Paulette and Victor leave to celebrate their reconciliation (as they planned before Kiki went mad). Later Victor returns and confides to the frightened Eddie that he left Paulette for the night and was done with women forever. He then goes into his bedroom to find Kiki asleep and back into the living room there's Paulette...in other words he failed. Paulette wants a piece of him, but eventually she finds Sleeping Kiki.

Then a gaggle of men arrive and explain that after she fainted, she didn't come to and a doctor was called. The doctor is convinced its some rare disease where she cant move at all and may be ''asleep'' for 2 years! Kiki is pretty convincing, though we audience get to see shes faking. The group leaves, and Paulette insists Victor shall come to her hotel. Victor tries to get ready and has to move Kiki around (she was lying on his hat and coat, etc). Paulette keeps screaming to him to hurry up, and he confides in Kiki that he wont be with that woman, and that shes kinda hot now that shes quiet (I think we'd all agree). Victor goes to lay her back on the bed (she had been moved on a couch during the explanation scene) and she kisses him. Shocked he goes out and tells Paulette to go away, which makes her mad saying their through.

She leaves and Victor tells Kiki to knock it off, and he cant seem to make up his mind about whether he likes her now or not. Paulette calls to make sure their through, and he assures her they are. Kiki pretends to leave, and Victor freaks and chases after her...only to find her patiently waiting out in the hall. They kiss, apparently to live happily ever after. The End.


Production

This film...is so interesting for so many reasons. It was first made in 1926 but Norma Talmadge, and apparently it was good (it still exists, but I haven't seen it). It did well at the box office and when Mary was looking for a new film it was Norma's husband Joseph Schenck (who was also part of UA) that suggested the film. As Whitfield pointed out the fact that Mary didn't take utter control of this film probably shows just how heart broken she was by the lukewarm reception to Taming of the Shrew (1929) as well as the failure of Forever Yours (never finished, became Secrets).

However it wasn't some slap dash production. Sam Taylor directed and Busby Berkley (a no0b at the time) did choreography. Reginald Denny and Margaret Livingston both had long careers before and (in Denny's case) after this film.

Mary had made 2 talkies before this, Coquette which was successful, and Taming of the Shrew which was not. Both were in 1929 and you gotta remember this was extremely new technology at the time. Everything that had been was now limited, as mics were extremely sensitive. Actors had to re-question everything they had ever done, and Mary was said to have had severe mic fright (for her radio show they had to hide it in a lamp). She would only make one more talkie (and for that matter film, at least acting wise) Secrets in 1933.

I think what is also of interest is by the time Taming was filmed, her and Douglas were on the rocks. One thing that is extremely interesting at least to me is the theme of cheating or a man who loves another in these last 2 films...like she had to work that out. At the very least the personal troubles probably didn't help her decision making.

Mary was 39 when this film was made. And as we all know she had made a career mostly off playing little girls...not by choice at that! She first tried rebelling in 1923 with Rosita and 1924's Dorothy Vernon. However it wasn't until 1927 she went for broke, cut the curls, and did My Best Girl, following it with Coquette. A lot of people don't understand why Mary seemed to fail talkies after being consistently popular from flickers onward. Most of the reason was she was getting older, and she grew tired of playing such young roles. When she quit being the little girl, she lost popularity. But she quit playing the little girl right as silents went out, and right as her marriage went out. Neither could have made a transition easy.

Reception

The film lost half its cost, and was a resounding flop. Mary noted months later that she wasn't at her height. Her drinking got worse, and soon she and Doug were over. She made one more try at talkies with the excellent, "Secrets" in 1933 but it wasn't enough....she never appeared onscreen again.



Review

As I sat watching this film I kept trying to put my finger on WHY it was so wrong. Despite everything horrifying about it, Mary is doing her best and its hard not to enjoy her. There are even times when it shines and you have to wonder why it went so wrong. Much like the end of her career I think there are numerous reasons.

One of the biggest is the character of Kiki is just SOOOO wrong for Mary. Mary was a FANTASTIC comedienne (see My Best Girl) but with sex as the focus it just didn't work. Her fame laid with the fact that she was very tiny (under 5 ft), had a large head, and a very childlike build. Kiki seems to be the type of character that would have been better with a tall leggy comedienne, or at least someone who could be taken as conventionally sexy (Marilyn Monroe, Suzanne Somers, even a Pamela Anderson). Mary could be sexy in her own way but it wasn't going to be with a Little Annie haircut. Wardrobing couldn't have helped either...for any era let alone 1930s Kiki's main outfit (the curled feather cap, polka dot blouse, and dark skirt) looks cartoonish and weird. It also puts the focus on legs which Mary just did NOT possess (in the scene where she looses her pants its quite obvious your looking at a 40 year old woman's legs). During the middle of the film Kiki is running around in this robe thing...its so horrifyingly bad I don't think Elton John would wear it! To make matters worse it too accentuates how tiny Mary was. During the dance number sequence she's supposed to be choir girl in the background, wearing a tuxedo. Though its a fantastic sequence the placement (alongside tall lanky choir girls) and the outfit (a man's tux) make Mary look just like she was: a 40 year old woman. That does NOT work for 20 something lanky Kiki.

Even if Mary had been more physically right for the part she was still too damned old. Old sexy women are WRONG (this means you Madonna and Sex and the City). Don't send me hate mail...what I mean is once you hit 40 hot pants are a no no (hell I'm 21 and hot pants are already a no no!). Be sophisticated. Kiki is anything but sophisticated. Mary had convincingly pulled off a teenager just a few years prior (Sparrows) so its not like she was just old and haggard. In Secrets she looks fantastic, and even kinda pulls off the teenaged version of ''Mary'' (though I feel her 20s-30s scenes were way more convincing). She had aged, but it could be hidden. For some reason that just didn't work in Kiki...close ups of her are about as terrifying as close ups of the plagued Mabel Normand in "Molly O". Add to her other physical obstacles this just comes off as extremely unconvincing. Another thing to wonder is just how old Kiki is supposed to be. One would guess her early 20s. There's an ironic scene where Victor tells Paulette of Kiki, "She's not a bad little kid". Is this supposed to be pedophile-esque?

I think overall Kiki is the kind of film Mary COULD have made had she escaped the little girl thing 20 years prior. But sex comedy has a limited shelf life...she's probably better off to have escaped it.

Mary's acting doesn't fit either. Honestly I have trouble seeing how anyone could LIKE Kiki as a person...she's INSANE and not very redeeming. Instead of being the spunky American girl who rises up and gets her way (per the usual Pickford films) she's a crazy bi polar French girl who lacks class and berates servants and gets her way just barely by being crazy. That in and of itself probably doomed this film. Kiki seems to be such a cartoonish character that big acting should be expected...yet (a Pickford rarity) Mary seems to overdo it especially in the beginning of the film. The moments she does try to bring some sympathy to Kiki all the problems just reappear...especially how old she looks and how cartoonish the wardrobe is.

I don't know why Mary was so bent on accents...I cant think of any other silent to talkies actor who went for accents at every turn. Of her 4 talkies 3 involve accents...and none of them work on any level. Coquette (Southern accent) is vaguely convincing, but unnecessary. Taming of the Shrew (odd British accent) is disturbingly bad, as is Kiki's French accent. It comes off as cartoonish and it doesn't always stick around. Any time Kiki has an extended rant she drops her accent at least once...especially in her first rant in the office and her rant later in the apartment when she talks about her love of Victor. Hilariously at one point (office rant) she almost sounded German after Canadian. It just doesn't work, and its probably one more thing that turned off viewers.

Despite these extremely fatal flaws Mary as a comedienne does shine through at points. When we first see her she's being thrown on her butt, which is an apt metaphor for what this film did to her career. When she fails to get her job back via begging she throws a hissy fit complete with kicks and whining. The dance number is fantastic, and despite its distracting issues mentioned above its almost Chaplin comparable. Everything that can go wrong does: her pants fall down, she lands in a drum, and she gets caught on Paulette. When the curtain goes down she and Paulette get in a cat fight, which is also fantastic.

As she begs for her job back after messing up she suggests to the depressed Victor that they commit suicide, and that the worst part is being talked out of it. Despite how morbid it sounds her delivery is hilarious. Kiki really REALLY hates Eddie (for no good reason) and right after the telegram business is discovered they get into a major fight which is fantastic. Her attempts to distract Victor during the phone call are mostly brilliant, though a few of them fall flat. As Victor prepares to go to his dinner with Paulette he and Kiki argue, as Kiki helps him dress in another great sequence.

I can't decide if the confrontation scene is fantastic or horrible. It is by far the most 'Sextette' part of this film. Whether a horrible misstep or genius I got to say its memorable, I will give Mary that.

An interesting thing to me about Kiki is it comes off very modern for 1931. It doesn't suffer the same troubles as other early talkies, and it flows a lot better than Secrets (which came later) does. There's no weird dialogue lapses and no forced attempts for silent acting. I realize I was viewing an archive print so I'm not sure how the audio necessarily sounded back in the day but some restoration is needed. The opening 5 mins or so involves the rehearsal song while Paulette and Victor have their little fits. The audio is extremely choppy and its impossible to hear the words over the music (and hard to hear the music at that!) It did get much better after that, but still I think some restoration is in order if it were ever to be screened or released.

I'm told some of the sequences come straight from the 1926 version. Honestly I think some of the plot and a lot of the characters fell flat. Certain points are hard to follow, and other moments just seem forced (such as the explanation as to why Kiki was in his bedroom...I mean would you let her in there after she tried to stab your ex wife?) The worst part is the main part (the love story) is extremely forced and never quite becomes interesting. Kiki loves the guy, but why? She says she's had sugar daddies and could easily get a new one...so why is this one so great? And why does he proposition her, only to change his mind and then act like a total douche until the last 10 minutes of the film? My guess is they were going for 'this poor guy is conflicted' but he mainly comes off as a guy who just cant make up his mind and would rather let a psychopath live with him then deal with her. When he does admit he likes her he immediately backtracks despite sending Paulette home. It just makes NO sense or sympathy! When they finally kiss one just doesn't care...no emotions are satisfied.

The character of Kiki isn't that great either. She's over dramatic, and for a French girl she's extremely low brow and unclassy (the way she eats, her penchant for butt kicking, etc). I'm sure the French have their chavs too but 1931 America wasn't going to ''get'' that. She's hard to sympathize with...she seems to love this guy and oh he doesn't love her...but in the mean time she's sneaking around, trying to kill the servant, picking cat fights, and eventually chasing his ex in a locked room with a knife. Maybe it was a horrible misstep in spunky, or maybe it was just a horrible misstep.

One final note I'd like to touch on is the Douglas angle. Kiki and Secrets both contain story lines that seem to parallel her troubles with Doug. In Secrets the long loving ''Mary'' is humilated when her husband's mistress shows up at their ball. He tries to apologize and admits the affair, and she graciously takes the news and admits she knows about ALL the women he's been playing around with. They kiss and make up, and we later see they're together well into their 80s.

In Kiki she wants a man who is madly in love with another woman, despite it being a very tumultious relationship. Paulette is a tall sexy lanky woman (the type who probably should have played Kiki) and is a bit of a diva. Before Kiki really even knows Victor they hate each other (cat fighting after Kiki's accidental scene stealing). When Victor tells her hes over all women she asks, "Even Paulette?" and when he says yes she says, "Oh Good!" After slapping the hell out of Victor and locking herself in his bedroom she takes up a picture of Paulette and rationalizes he is still in love with her. She starts yelling at the photo, telling her how she doesnt deserve him and how she Kiki will win him yet. She then smashes the hell out of the photo and frame and starts her journey to win him over.

And then of course later once Victor and Paulette reconcile Kiki locks her in the room, confronts her just as violently as the picture, pulls out the knife, and chases her around. Usually this would result in some sort of arrest. In the film Kiki ''faints'' and through clever manuevering still wins the man.

One must wonder just what Mary was trying to convey in those scenes. It was during this time Sylvia Ashley first popped up, and she was definitly very Paulette (though she was as uncouth as Kiki herself). The marriage had been shaken before, but it was during this time it was shaken to its core. By the time Secrets was filmed they were basically seperated. Secrets is a fine piece of acting, but I am certain many a woman would love to act at those Kiki fantasies.


Release

To my knowledge Kiki has never been officially released in any format. According to some googling a few people claimed to have a bootleg (in poor quality) but I have yet to see one for sale anywhere including Ebay or ioffer. UCLA houses the print I seen, and they have screened it from time to time (last fall was one). It doesnt show up much, probably for good reason (I suggest bringing booze if you can).